Bibliografía
A diferencia de la versión previa (v. 5), el listado bibliográfico ahora se genera automáticamente a partir de las citas incluidas en el texto principal, gestionadas y verificadas al detalle mediante un fichero referencias.bib. Las entradas no asociadas a cita específica o soporte de casos pasan a integrarse en el bloque complementario.
2nd World Conference on Research Integrity. (2010). Singapore Statement
on Research Integrity. Singapur, 21-24 de julio de 2010. https://www.wcrif.org/guidance/singapore-statement.
Abellán López, M. Á. (2021). El cambio climático: Negacionismo,
escepticismo y desinformación. Tabula Rasa. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n37.13.
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021). A billion-dollar
donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review.
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2.
Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O’Brien, K.
(2013). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation.
Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666.
Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios. (s. f.).
Información sobre CTIS y el Reglamento de ensayos clínicos (UE)
536/2014. AEMPS. El Reglamento se aplica desde el 31-01-2022; CTIS es
punto único de entrada desde el 31-01-2023 y el periodo transitorio
desde EudraCT se cerró el 31-01-2025. https://www.aemps.gob.es/medicamentos-de-uso-humano/investigacion_medicamentos/ensayosclinicos/informacion-sobre-ctis-y-reglamento-de-ensayos-clinicos-ue-536-2014/
(Consultado el 23/08/2026).
Agencia Europea de Defensa. (2026). Defence Data 2025-2026.
Bruselas: European Defence Agency. https://eda.europa.eu.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for
“Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market
Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3),
488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.
Alikhademi, K., Drobina, E., Prioleau, D., Richardson, B., Purves, D.,
& Gilbert, J. E. (2022). A Review of Predictive Policing from the
Perspective of Fairness. Artificial Intelligence and Law,
30(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09286-4.
ALLEA — All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for
Research Integrity. Revised Edition 2023. Berlín: ALLEA. https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/European-Code-of-Conduct-Revised-Edition-2023.pdf.
Almond, D., Du, X., & Papp, A. (2022). Favourability towards natural
gas relates to funding source of university energy centres. Nature
Climate Change, 12(12), 1122-1128. Tiene réplica pública
del Center on Global Energy Policy de la Universidad de Columbia
(febrero de 2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01521-3.
Anderson, C. (2008). The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the
Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
Andrews, M. (2026). The Immortal Science of ML: Machine
Learning and the Theory-Free Ideal. Erkenntnis, 91(6),
2685-2707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-01010-x.
Annepaka, Y., & Pakray, P. (2025). Large Language Models: A Survey
of Their Development, Capabilities, and Applications. Knowledge and
Information Systems, 67(3), 2967-3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02310-4.
Ansede, M. (2024). La editorial Springer Nature retira 75 estudios del
rector de Salamanca y sus colaboradores por prácticas fraudulentas. El
País, 16 de octubre. https://elpais.com/ciencia/2024-10-16/la-editorial-springer-nature-retira-75-estudios-del-rector-de-salamanca-y-sus-colaboradores-por-practicas-fraudulentas.html.
Anthony, K. R. N., D. I. Kline, G. D.-P., Dove, S., &
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2008). Ocean Acidification Causes Bleaching and
Productivity Loss in Coral Reef Builders. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804478105.
Arenales, M. G. (2022). Sara tenía 30 perforaciones en varios órganos,
lesiones más propias de una reyerta con armas. la muerte en España
de una mujer tras una operación de cirugía estética. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-60033092.
Atiyeh, B. S., Rubeiz, M. T., & Hayek, S. N. (2008).
Aesthetic/Cosmetic Surgery and Ethical Challenges. Aesthetic Plastic
Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9246-3.
Auwal, A. R., Ishak, A. S., Saidu Musa, S., Musa, A., Saadu, A., &
Riaz, A. (2025). The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and
the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations.
Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1589010. Es un informe
de posición con proyecciones, no un estudio de efectos observados. Su
dato más sólido es histórico: los 2.400 millones de dólares que USAID
movilizó en el brote de ébola de 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589010.
Barraclough, E. (2013). Repercusiones del caso Myriad para la
biotecnologia. Revista de la OMPI, (4). https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/es/2013/04/article_0007.html.
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakçı, Ö., & Mariman,
R. (2025). Generative AI without Guardrails Can Harm
Learning: Evidence from High School Mathematics. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 122, e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of
biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and
territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines.
McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Becker, B., Roper, S., & Vanino, E. (2023). Assessing Innovation
Spillovers from Publicly Funded R&D and Innovation
Support: Evidence from the UK. Technovation,
128, 102860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102860.
Beretervide, V. (2019). Conocimiento, afectividad y verdad: Un camino de
integración. https://www.aacademica.org/000-111/159.
Bergmann, M. (2021). Radical skepticism and epistemic
intuition. Oxford University Press USA -
OSO.
Blanco, D. (1/10/2018): Cómo analizar la calidad de un artículo
científico: el riesgo de sesgo y la guía de publicación
CONSORT en ensayos aleatorizados. (2018). https://www.elsevier.com/es-es/connect/educacion-medica/analizar-calidad-articulo-cientifico-guia-de-publicacion-consort.
Blanshard, B. (1939). The Nature of Thought. London: Allen &
Unwin.
Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and
Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bonetta, L. (2007). Scientists Enter the Blogosphere. Cell.
Boyd, R. (1990). Realism, approximate truth, and philosophical
method. In C.
Boykoff, M. T. (2015). Consenso y oposición al cambio climático. Revista
Mètode. Mètode n.º 85, primavera de 2015. Documenta el vinculo entre
iniciativas de oposicion en EE. UU. y financiacion de la industria de
combustibles fosiles. https://metode.es/revistas-metode/monograficos/consenso-y-oposicion-al-cambio-climatico.html.
Brayne, S., & Christin, A. (2021). Technologies of Crime Prediction:
The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts. Social
Problems, 68(3), 608-624. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa004.
Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who Knows What and
Who Can We Believe? Epistemological Beliefs Are Beliefs about Knowledge
(Mostly) to Be Attained from Others. En L. D. Bendixen & F. C.
Feucht (eds.) Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Theory,
Research, and Implications for Practice, (pp. 163-194). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers
misunderstand the world. The MIT Press.
Brulle, R. J. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and
the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations.
Climatic Change, 122(4), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative
AI at Work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
140(2), 889-942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044.
Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013).
Climate change prediction: erring on the side of least drama? Global
Environmental Change, 23(1), 327-337. Documenta
subestimacion sistematica de la gravedad en nivel del mar, hielo ártico
e intensidad de huracanes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008.
Bucchi, M. (2008). Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: theories of
public communication of science. En M. Bucchi & B. Trench (eds.)
Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology,
(pp. 71-90). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203928240-11.
Budak, C., Nyhan, B., Rothschild, D. M., Thorson, E., & Watts, D. J.
(2024). Misunderstanding the Harms of Online Misinformation.
Nature, 630(8015), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07417-w.
Bunge, M. A. (2002). Crisis y reconstrucción de la filosofía.
Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
Bush, V. (1945). Science, The Endless Frontier: A Report to the
President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Washington,
DC: United States Government Printing Office. https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/vbush1945.htm.
Butler, D., & Eilperin, J. (2020, febrero 23). The Anti-Greta: A
Conservative Think Tank Takes on the Global Phenomenon. The Washington
Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2020/02/23/meet-anti-greta-young-youtuber-campaigning-against-climate-alarmism/.
Cao, Z., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., Li, C., & Sivertsen, G. (2025). How
Does Scientific Research Generate Impact Beyond Academia?
Cross-Disciplinary Comparison Based on REF Impact Cases.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1),
1856. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06129-4.
Carbon Brief. (2026). Mapped: How climate change affects extreme weather
around the world. Base de datos actualizada el 19-03-2026: más de 900
estudios de atribución sobre cerca de 1.000 episodios; el 77 por ciento
resultó más probable o más severo por el cambio climático de origen
humano y en el 85 por ciento se identificó influencia humana. https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/attribution-studies/index.html
(Consultado el 24/08/2026).
Carmen, S. et al. (2015). El método socrático. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/65655.
Carter, J. A., Gordon, E. C., & Jarvis, B. W. (eds.). (2018).
Knowledge First: Approaches in Epistemology and Mind. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N. (2012). Nomological machines and the laws they
produce. The Dappled World.
Castells, M. (2016). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements
in the internet age. Polity Press.
Ceballos, N. (2021). El pensamiento conspiranoico. Barcelona.
Center, P. R. (2010). Public views on science and technology.
Washington.
Chapekis, A., & Lieb, A. (2025, julio 22). Google Users Are Less
Likely to Click on Links When an AI Summary Appears in the
Results. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/22/google-users-are-less-likely-to-click-on-links-when-an-ai-summary-appears-in-the-results/.
Chaudhary, A. (2025). AI Agentic Workflows: the next
frontier in enterprise automation. https://www.turing.com/resources/ai-agentic-workflows.
Cheng, M. W. T., Yang, X., & Allen, R. M. (2026). Tracking the
retracted paper mill articles: a bibliometric study.
Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05751-6.
Chisholm, R. (1989). Theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). Prentice
Hall.
Chomsky, N. (2002). El control de los medios de comunicación. en
Noam Chomsky e Ignacio Ramonet.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Los guardianes de la libertad. Propaganda.
Chowa, S. S., Alvi, R., Rahman, S. S., et al. (2026). From Language to
Action: A Review of Large Language Models as Autonomous Agents and Tool
Users. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11471-9.
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W.,
& Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Coady, D., & Corry, R. (2013a). The Climate Change Debate. In
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326287.
Coady, D., & Corry, R. (2013b). The climate change debate: An
epistemic and ethical enquiry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Code, L. (2013). Doubt and Denial: Epistemic Responsibility Meets
Climate Change Scepticism. Oñati Socio-Legal
Series, 3(5), 838-853. https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/252.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2022). The Political Philosophy of
AI: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). Why AI Undermines Democracy
and What to Do about It. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cohen, & al, J. F. et. (2016). STARD 2015 guidelines
for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.
BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The Third Wave of Science
Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of
Science, 32(2), 235-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Colquhoun, D., & Novella, S. P. (2013). Acupuncture Is Theatrical
Placebo. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 116(6), 1360-1363.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828f2d5e.
Comesaña, J., & Klein, P. (2024). Skepticism. En E. N. Zalta &
U. Nodelman (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/skepticism/.
Comision Europea. (2026a, abril 29). Commission Preliminarily Finds Meta
in Breach of Digital Services Act for Failing to Prevent Minors under 13
from Using Instagram and Facebook. Comision Europea, IP/26/920. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_920.
Comision Europea. (2026b, julio 10). Commission Preliminarily Finds the
Addictive Design of Instagram and Facebook in Breach of the Digital
Services Act. Comision Europea, IP/26/1579. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-preliminarily-finds-addictive-design-instagram-and-facebook-breach-digital-services-act.
Comisión Europea. (2025). Interim Evaluation of the Horizon Europe
Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027). (n.º
SWD(2025) 110 final). Bruselas: Comisión Europea. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A52025SC0110.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2024). Authorship and AI tools.
COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools.
Confederación de Sociedades Científicas de España (COSCE). (2026). Por
un Sistema Español de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SECTI) más
eficiente y de mayor impacto. Manifiesto, 16 de abril, revisado el 29 de
abril. https://cosce.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Manifiesto-COSCE-por-un-SECTI-mas-eficiente_rev.pdf.
Copernicus Climate Change Service. (2026). Global Climate Highlights
2025: 2025 fue el tercer año más cálido registrado. ECMWF, Servicio de
Cambio Climático de Copernicus. Publicado el 14-01-2026. 2025: 1,47 °C
sobre el nivel preindustrial, tercer año más cálido tras 2024 y 2023;
primera vez que la media de tres años consecutivos supera 1,5 °C; los
once últimos años son los once más cálidos del registro. https://climate.copernicus.eu/copernicus-2025-was-third-hottest-year-record
(Consultado el 24/08/2026).
COSCE. (2018, junio 8). Pseudociencias y pseudoterapias. Una verdad
igualmente incómoda. https://cosce.org/pseudociencias-y-pseudoterapias-una-verdad-igualmente-incomoda-jornada-cosce-2018/.
Crawford, M. M., & Wright, G. (2022). The Value of Mass-Produced
COVID-19 Scenarios: A Quality Evaluation of Development
Processes and Scenario Content. Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 183, 121937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121937.
Damnjanovic, N., & Candlish, S. (2013). The Myth of the Coherence
Theory of Truth. Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy
and Phenomenology. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286338_8.
Dani, M., & Menéndez, A. J. (2025). The EU’s (Not So)
Cheap Talk on Defence. European Law Open. Editorial. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2025.10041.
David, M. (2022). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence.
De Freitas, J., Oǧuz-Uǧuralp, Z., Uǧuralp, A. K., & Puntoni, S.
(2026). AI Companions Reduce Loneliness. Journal of
Consumer Research, 52(6), 1126-1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaf040.
De la Cuesta, D. G. (2021). Errores y sesgos en investigación clínica.
Enfermería Intensiva. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfi.2021.03.003.
DellAcqua, F., McFowland III, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz-Assaf, H.,
Kellogg, K. C., et al. (2026). Navigating the Jagged Technological
Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial
Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality.
Organization Science, 37(2), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.21838.
Dembicki, G. (2025). Exxon funded thinktanks to spread climate denial in
Latin America, documents reveal. The Guardian. Texas-based
fossil fuel company financed Atlas Network in attempt to derail UN-led
climate treaty process. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/03/exxon-funded-thinktanks-to-spread-climate-denial-in-latin-america-documents-reveal.
Dessler, A. E., & Parson, E. A. (2019). The science and politics
of global climate change: A guide to the debate. Cambridge
University Press.
Devlin, W. J., & Bokulich, A. (2015). Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific
Revolutions - 50 Years On. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and
History of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13383-6.
Dicasterio para la Doctrina de la Fe, & Dicasterio para la Cultura y
la Educación. (2025). Nota Antiqua et nova sobre la relación entre
inteligencia artificial e inteligencia humana. Ciudad del Vaticano:
Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Firmada el 14 de enero de 2025 y publicada
el 28 de enero, fecha que recoge la dirección en vatican.va. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20250128_antiqua-et-nova_sp.html.
Diéguez, A. (2022). Negacionismo, anticiencia y pseudociencias: ¿En qué
se diferencian? Cuaderno de Cultura Científica. https://culturacientifica.com/2022/02/14/negacionismo-anticiencia-y-pseudociencias-en-que-se-diferencian/.
Dijck, J. van. (2014). Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data
between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology. Surveillance &
Society, 12(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.
Döring, S., & Krampe, F. (2026). From knowledge to action: Forging a
more effective science-policy interface for water and climate security.
Environmental Development, 59, 101494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2026.101494.
Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free
Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dunlap, R. E. et al. (2016). The Political Divide on Climate Change:
Partisan Polarization Widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and
Policy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995.
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change
denial. En J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (eds.)
The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. Figuraba como @article con journaltitle «Oxford
Handbooks Online»; es un capitulo del manual. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0010.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., et
al. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So What if ChatGPT Wrote
It?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities,
Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI
for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of
Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
Eakin, H., & Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of
social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and
Resources, 31, 365-394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352.
Ebbs, G. (2025). Content Externalism and Skepticism. En E. N. Zalta
& U. Nodelman (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2025/entries/skepticism-content-externalism/.
Ecológica, M. para la T., & Reto Demográfico, el. (2025). Prevención
de la desinformación climática. Documentos de trabajo del Plan Nacional
de Adaptación al Cambio Climático. https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/ceneam/recursos/prevencion_desinformacion_climatica.pdf.
Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic Research in the 21st
Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse
Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering
Science, 34(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223.
Edwards, P. N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate
Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eklund, A., Nichols, T. E., & Knutsson, H. (2016). Cluster failure:
Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive
rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
113(28), 7900-7905. Tiene corrección publicada semanas después,
PNAS 113(33), E4929: la declaración de relevancia original daba a
entender que quedaban invalidadas las 40.000 publicaciones de
resonancia funcional, y se rebajó a «un número de estudios». https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113.
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are
GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large
language models. arXiv. https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2303.10130.
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2024). GPTs are
GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj0998.
Empiricus, S. (2000). Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism.
Eds.
Enayati, A., Hemingway, J., & Garner, P. (2007). Electronic mosquito
repellents for preventing mosquito bites and malaria infection.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005434.pub2.
Ernst, E. (2012, abril 3). Why I changed my mind about homeopathy.
The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/apr/03/homeopathy-why-i-changed-my-mind.
Espino, R. (2026, julio 14). Todas las víctimas del incendio de Los
Gallardos ya han sido identificadas. Diario de Almería.
Incendio iniciado el 10-07-2026. La cobertura del 14 de julio da 13
fallecidos. https://www.diariodealmeria.es/almeria/victimas-incendio-gallardos-han-sido_0_2007448140.html.
European Forest Fire Information System. (2026). European Forest Fire
Information System (EFFIS): estadísticas de superficie quemada.
Copernicus Emergency Management Service, Comisión Europea. Datos
provisionales a 23-08-2026: 297.633 ha quemadas en España en 2026,
247.132 de ellas entre julio y agosto, con 42 grandes incendios; 393.079
ha en 2025. EFFIS estima por satélite a partir de 30 ha, umbral distinto
del que emplea el balance oficial del MITECO. https://forest-fire.emergency.copernicus.eu/
(Consultado el 23/08/2026).
Eurostat. (2025). Government budget allocations for R&D,
2024. Oficina Estadística de la Unión Europea. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250729-2.
Fanelli, D. (2009). How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research?
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS ONE,
4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Fang, F. C., Bowen, A., & Casadevall, A. (2016). NIH peer review
percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity.
eLife, 5, e13323. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13323.
Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2016). Research Funding: the Case for
a Modified Lottery. mBio, 7(2), e00422-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00422-16.
FECYT. (2020). 10.ª Encuesta de percepción social de la ciencia y la
tecnología-2020. Gobierno de España.
Feinstein, N. (2010). Salvaging science literacy. Science
Education, 95(1), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414.
Feller, I. (1990). Universities as engines of R&D-based economic
growth: They think they can. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90017-z.
Fenwick, A., & Molnar, G. (2022). The Importance of Humanizing
AI: Using a Behavioral Lens to Bridge the Gaps between
Humans and Machines. Discover Artificial Intelligence,
2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00030-8.
Fernández Menéndez, J., & García López-Romero, F. J. (2018). La
comunicación del conocimiento científico: análisis comparativo entre las
revistas académicas y las redes sociales. Revista Latina de
Comunicación Social.
Feyerabend, P. (2002). Against method (Reprinted der 3.
Fieldhouse, A. J., & Mertens, K. (2025). The Social Returns to
Public R&D. (n.º 33780). Cambridge, MA: National
Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33780.
Finger, L., Bogaert, V. van den, Schmidt, L., Fleischer, J., Stadtler,
M., Sommer, K., & Wirth, J. (2023). The Science of Citizen Science:
A Systematic Literature Review on Educational and Scientific Outcomes.
Frontiers in Education, 8, 1226529. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1226529.
Finniss, D. G., Kaptchuk, T. J., Miller, F., & Benedetti, F. (2010).
Biological, Clinical, and Ethical Advances of Placebo Effects. The
Lancet, 375(9715), 686-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61706-2.
Firestein, S. (2016). Failure: Why science is so successful.
Oxford University Press.
Fiscalia General de California. (2026, agosto 26). Attorney General
Bonta Secures Transformative $17 Billion Settlement with Meta.
California Department of Justice. https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-secures-transformative-17-billion-settlement-meta.
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter Bubbles, Echo
Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion
Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006.
Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is
Reshaping Human Reality. Londres.
Freire, J., Infante, A., De Aguiar, A. C., & Carbajo, P. (2015). An
analysis of the medical specialty training system in Spain. Human
Resources for Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0038-y.
Fricker, M. (2009). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of
Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, J. (2013). Suspended Judgment. Philosophical Studies,
162(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9753-y.
Friedman, J. (2017). Why Suspend Judging? Noûs, 51(2),
302-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12137.
Froneman, W. (2026). Failed Comprehensiveness, Successful Minimalism:
Wikipedia’s 3-Year Struggle to Govern AI-Generated Content
(2022-2025). AI & Society, 41(7), 7045-7061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03046-1.
Frontiers Editorial Office. (2014). Retraction: Recursive fury:
Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on
conspiracist ideation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,
293. La nota de retractación declara expresamente que la investigación
no halló problemas en los aspectos académicos ni éticos del estudio, y
que la retirada se debe a que «el contexto legal no está suficientemente
claro». El trabajo se republicó en 2015 como «Recurrent Fury» en el
Journal of Social and Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00293.
Fumerton, R. A. (2011). Skepticism and Epistemic Externalism. En S.
Bernecker & D. Pritchard (eds.) The Routledge Companion to
Epistemology, (pp. 488-499). Londres: Routledge.
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali. (2025). Provvedimento del
10 aprile 2025 nei confronti di Luka Inc. (Replika), doc. web n.
10130115. Garante per la protezione dei dati personali. https://www.garanteprivacy.it/web/guest/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10130115.
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated
selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H.,
Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets.
Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723.
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Analysis, 23(6), 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121.
Gibbon, S., Prainsack, B., & Hilgartner, S. (2020). Routledge
Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society. Routledge.
Global Witness, & Kick Big Polluters Out. (2025). Fossil fuel
lobbyists flood COP30 climate talks in Brazil, with largest ever
attendance share. Publicado el 14-11-2025. Recuento sobre la lista
provisional de participantes de la CMNUCC de 10-11-2025: 1.602
cabilderos acreditados, uno de cada 25 asistentes, más que cualquier
delegación nacional salvo la de Brasil, y dos tercios más que los diez
países más vulnerables juntos. https://globalwitness.org/en/press-releases/fossil-fuel-lobbyists-flood-cop30-climate-talks-in-brazil-with-largest-ever-attendance-share/
(Consultado el 24/08/2026).
Gluck, S. (2023). Robustness of climate models. Philosophy of
Science, 90(5), 1407-1416. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.62.
Gobierno de España. (2025). Plan Industrial y
Tecnológico para la Seguridad y la Defensa. Madrid:
Consejo de Ministros. https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/consejodeministros/resumenes/Documents/2025/230425-plan-industrial-y-tecnologico-para-la-seguridad-y-la-defensa.pdf.
Gold, E. R., & Carbone, J. (2010). Myriad Genetics: In the eye of
the policy storm. Genetics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e3181d72661.
Goldacre, B., Drysdale, H., Dale, A., Milosevic, I., Slade, E., Hartley,
P., Marston, C., Powell-Smith, A., Heneghan, C., & Mahtani, K. R.
(2019). COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58
misreported trials in real time. Trials, 20, 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2.
Goldman, A. I. (2001). Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(1),
85-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x.
Gómez-García, F. et al. (2018). Image Gallery: Dermoscopy of lichen
amyloidosis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17109.
González de la Torre, P., Pérez-Verdugo, M., & Barandiaran, X. E.
(2026). Attention Is All They Need: Cognitive Science and the
(Techno)political Economy of Attention in Humans and Machines. AI
& Society, 41(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02400-z.
González-Bailón, S., Lazer, D., Barberá, P., et al. (2023). Asymmetric
Ideological Segregation in Exposure to Political News on Facebook.
Science, 381(6656), 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade7138.
Gordin, M. D. (2012). The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky
and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Gottweis, J., & Natarajan, V. (2025). Accelerating scientific
breakthroughs with an AI co-scientist. Google Research Blog. Entrada del
blog; presenta AI co‑scientist, un sistema multiagente construido con
Gemini 2.0 como colaborador científico virtual. https://research.google/blog/accelerating-scientific-breakthroughs-with-an-ai-co-scientist/.
Granados Mateo, J. L. (2019). Ciencia posnormal, o cómo se estudia el
clima en tiempos de incertidumbre. The Conversation España. https://theconversation.com/ciencia-posnormal-o-como-se-estudia-el-clima-en-tiempos-de-incertidumbre-127881.
Greco, J. (2008). The oxford handbook of skepticism (1st ed).
Oxford University Press.
Greco, J. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford
University Press.
Greenacre, M. (2025, julio 17). “Horizon Europe Will Be
Dual Use by Default”, Zaharieva Says.
ScienceBusiness. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/dual-use/horizon-europe-will-be-dual-use-default-zaharieva-says.
Gross, K., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2019). Contest models highlight
inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions. PLoS
Biology, 17(1), e3000065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000065.
Guess, A. M., Malhotra, N., Pan, J., et al. (2023a). How Do Social Media
Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes and Behavior in an Election Campaign?
Science, 381(6656), 398-404. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9364.
Haack, S. (1976). The Pragmatist Theory of Truth. The British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/27.3.231.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and
international policy coordination. International Organization.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442.
Habermas, J. (1984a). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1:
Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas
McCarthy.
Habermas, J. (1984b). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and
the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1994). Historia y crítica de la opinión pública: la
transformación estructural de la vida pública. Barcelona: Gustavo
Gili. Original alemán de 1962, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Es el
estudio histórico de la degradación de la esfera pública por la
publicidad organizada: sostiene la afirmación sobre la opinión pública
manipulable, no una tesis prescriptiva sobre deliberación.
Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. E., & Wajcman, J.
(2007). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, third edition.
National Geographic Books.
Hadjisotiriou, S., Marchau, V., Walker, W., & Olde Rikkert, M.
(2023). Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty for Pandemic Policy
Planning. Health Policy, 133, 104831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104831.
Hall, B., Jackson, E., Tandon, R., & Lall, N. (2013). Knowledge,
democracy and action: Community-University Research Partnerships in
Global Perspectives. Manchester University Press.
Hamlington, B. D., Bellas-Manley, A., Willis, J. K., Fournier, S.,
Vinogradova, N., Nerem, R. S., Piecuch, C. G., Thompson, P. R., &
Kopp, R. (2024). The rate of global sea level rise doubled during the
past three decades. Communications Earth & Environment,
5, 601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01761-5.
Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
63, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.
Hansson, S. O. (2020). Social Constructionism and Climate Science
Denial. European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
10(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00305-w.
Hansson, S. O. (2021). Science and Pseudo-Science. En E. N. Zalta (ed.)
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research
Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/.
Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic Dependence. The Journal of
Philosophy, 82(7), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026523.
Haroon, M., Wojcieszak, M., Chhabra, A., Liu, X., Mohapatra, P., &
Shafiq, Z. (2023). Auditing YouTube’s Recommendation System
for Ideologically Congenial, Extreme, and Problematic Recommendations.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
120(50), e2213020120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213020120.
Harrington, L. J., & Otto, F. E. L. (2023). Underestimated Climate
Risks from Population Ageing. npj Climate and Atmospheric
Science, 6(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00398-z.
Hartmann, D., Wang, S. M., Pohlmann, L., & Berendt, B. (2025). A
Systematic Review of Echo Chamber Research: Comparative Analysis of
Conceptualizations, Operationalizations, and Varying Outcomes.
Journal of Computational Social Science, 8(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z.
Hazlett, A. (2014). A critical introduction to skepticism.
Bloomsbury Publishing.
He, T. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to
2010. Scientometrics, 96(2), 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3.
Herbert, D. L., Barnett, A. G., Clarke, P., & Graves, N. (2013). On
the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of
Australian researchers. BMJ Open, 3(5), e002800. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002800.
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., Rijcke, S. de, & Rafols, I.
(2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a.
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page,
M. J., & Welch, V. A. (eds.). (2026). Cochrane Handbook for
Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane. Versión vigente,
actualizada de forma continua. Consultada el 23 de agosto de 2026. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current.
Higgins, & al, J. P. T. et. (2021). Assessing risk of bias in a
randomized trial. In J. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-08.
Hippel, T. von, & Hippel, C. von. (2015). To Apply or Not to Apply:
A Survey Analysis of Grant Writing Costs and Benefits. PLOS
ONE, 10(3), e0118494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118494.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific
Research Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
Hmielowski, J. D., Lauren Feldman, T. A. M., Leiserowitz, A., &
Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in
scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding
of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513480091.
Hoggan, J., & R. Littlemore, R. (2009). Climate cover-up: The
crusade to deny global warming. Greystone Books.
Holt, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key Dimensions
of Alternative News Media. Digital Journalism, 7(7),
860-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715.
Horwich, P. (1998). Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hugging Face. (2026). State of open source on Hugging Face: Spring 2026.
Informe de 17-03-2026: más de 2 millones de modelos públicos, más de
500.000 conjuntos de datos y 13 millones de usuarios registrados. https://huggingface.co/blog/huggingface/state-of-os-hf-spring-2026
(Consultado el 23/08/2026).
Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change:
Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Hulme, Mike. (2011). Meet the humanities. Nature Climate
Change, 1(4), 177-179. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1150.
Huszár, F., Ktena, S. I., O’Brien, C., Belli, L., Schlaikjer, A., &
Hardt, M. (2022). Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on
Twitter. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 119(1), e2025334119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025334119.
Ichikawa, J. J., & Steup, M. (2024). The Analysis of Knowledge. En
E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/.
Infobae España. (2026). Los bomberos forestales alertan de un verano de
alto riesgo de incendios por la falta de prevención: «Nos estamos
jugando otra tragedia». Publicado el 23-06-2026, semanas antes de los
grandes incendios del verano. Recoge las carencias denunciadas por CCOO:
menos del 44 por ciento de los recursos operativos a principios de
junio, retenes incompletos, contratos de seis meses, jornadas de hasta
18 horas y disparidad de criterios entre comunidades autónomas. https://www.infobae.com/espana/2026/06/23/los-bomberos-forestales-alertan-de-un-verano-de-alto-riesgo-de-incendios-por-la-falta-de-prevencion-nos-estamos-jugando-otra-tragedia/
(Consultado el 23/08/2026).
Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de La
Plata. (2026). Desarmando la inteligencia artificial: aportes de León
XIV desde Magnifica humanitas. Análisis de coyuntura n.º 63. https://www.iri.edu.ar/index.php/2026/08/18/analisis-de-coyuntura-n-63-desarmando-la-inteligencia-artificial-aportes-de-leon-xiv-desde-magnifica-humanitas/.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed.). (2021). Climate
Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I
to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Anexo VII, glosario, p. 2222. Define el clima como la
descripción estadística de las magnitudes relevantes en un periodo,
clásicamente de treinta años. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_AnnexVII.pdf.
IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of
Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ginebra: IPCC. El AR6
emplea lenguaje calibrado de incertidumbre: grados de confianza y
términos de probabilidad definidos numéricamente. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as
Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture
& Society, 27(2-3), 233-253. El campo journaltitle
contenia solo «Theory», resto de un parseo truncado. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497.
Jasanoff, S., Hilgartner, S., & Hurlbut, J. B. (2021). Was ’science’
on the ballot? Science, 371(6532), 893-894. Sustituye
a una referencia no localizable: «The crisis of science advising»,
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 77(2), 67-76, que no consta en
Crossref ni en el sumario de la revista. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8762.
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media
Collide. Nueva York.
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the
Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth
Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953.
Johnson, D. (2025). OpenAI’s PhD-Level AI Agent for $20,000
Per Month Sparkes Debate. Medium. https://medium.com/@derrickjswork/openais-phd-level-ai-agent-for-20-000-per-month-sparkes-debate-2cb26be7cb69.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural
cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L.,
Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science
literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature
Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of
Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
Kallergi, A., & Landeweerd, L. (2025). Science, Activism, and
Climate Action: Navigating Credibility, Responsibility, and Engagement.
Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1759-1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09626-y.
Karikó, K., Buckstein, M., Ni, H., & Weissman, D. (2005).
Suppression of RNA Recognition by Toll-like
Receptors: The Impact of Nucleoside Modification and the Evolutionary
Origin of RNA. Immunity, 23(2), 165-175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008.
Kausche, K., & Weiss, M. (2025). Platform Power and Regulatory
Capture in Digital Governance. Business and Politics,
27(2), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.33.
Kennedy, D. A., Cooley, K., Einarson, T. R., & Seely, D. (2012).
Objective assessment of an ionic footbath (IonCleanse): testing its
ability to remove potentially toxic elements from the body. Journal
of Environmental and Public Health, 2012, 258968. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/258968.
Khan Academy. (2024). Lecciones de biología: experimentos y
observaciones. https://es.khanacademy.org/science/biology/intro-to-biology/science-of-biology/a/experiments-and-observations.
Khattar, P., & Kostakis, V. (2026). Mining the Commons:
AI Extraction, Wikipedia, and the Case for a
Multi-stakeholder Settlement. Internet Policy Review,
15(1). https://policyreview.info/articles/news/commons-ai-extraction-wikipedia/2089.
Kim, M., Lee, S., Kim, S., Heo, J., Lee, S., Shin, Y.-B., Cho, C.-H.,
& Jung, D. (2025). Therapeutic Potential of Social Chatbots in
Alleviating Loneliness and Social Anxiety: Quasi-Experimental Mixed
Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research,
27, e65589. https://doi.org/10.2196/65589.
Kisa, A., & Kisa, S. (2025). Health conspiracy theories: a scoping
review of drivers, impacts, and countermeasures. International
Journal for Equity in Health, 24, 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02451-0.
Kitcher, P. (1990). The Division of Cognitive Labor. The Journal of
Philosophy, 87(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026796.
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts.
Big Data & Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.
Kjell, O. N. E., Kjell, K., & Schwartz, H. A. (2024). Beyond Rating
Scales: With Targeted Evaluation, Language Models Are Poised for
Psychological Assessment. Psychiatry Research, 333,
115667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115667.
Klenk, M. (2022). (Online) Manipulation: Sometimes Hidden, Always
Careless. Review of Social Economy, 80(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1894350.
Königs, P. (2024). In Defense of “Surveillance
Capitalism”. Philosophy & Technology,
37(4), 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00804-1.
Kube, T., Huhn, J., & Menzel, C. (2025). Optimistic Bias in Updating
Beliefs about Climate Change Longitudinally Predicts Low
Pro‐environmental Behaviour. British Journal of Social
Psychology, 64(3), e12905. Artículo disponible en PMC. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12905.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions.
Kuhn, T. S. (1994). The structure of scientific revolutions (2.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). La revolución copernicana: la astronomía
planetaria en el desarrollo del pensamiento. Ariel.
Kunne, W. (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Oxford.
Kuran, T. (1995). Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social
Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific
Research Programmes. En I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.)
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, (pp. 91-196). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Lalani, H. S., Nagar, S., Sarpatwari, A., Avorn, J., Engelberg, A.,
Chaves, A., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2023). US Public
Investment in Development of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines:
Retrospective Cohort Study. BMJ, 380, e073747. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073747.
Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S.,
Creutzig, F., et al. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global
Sustainability, 3, e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13.
Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., & Payne, D. G. (1998). Memory
illusions and consciousness: Examining the phenomenology of true and
false memories. Current Psychology.
Lara, F., & Rodríguez-López, B. (2024). Socratic nudges, virtual
moral assistants and the problem of autonomy. AI &
Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01846-3.
laSexta.com. (2018, octubre 21). El imperio económico de las
pseudociencias: así ganan miles de millones de euros por remedios sin
base científica. https://www.lasexta.com/noticias/sociedad/el-millonario-negocio-de-las-pseudociencias-ganan-millones-de-euros-por-remedios-sin-base-cientifica_201810215bcc95da0cf2fd5173881b6c.htm.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of
fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2),
225-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
Laudan, L. (1983). The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. En R. S. Cohen
& L. Laudan (eds.) Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis,
(pp. 111-127). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6.
Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method,
and evidence. Filadelfia.
Lave, R., Mirowski, P., & Randalls, S. (2010). Introduction: STS and
neoliberal science. Social Studies of Science, 40(5),
659-675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710378549.
Le Noury, J., Nardo, J. M., Healy, D., Jureidini, J., Raven, M.,
Tufanaru, C., & Abi-Jaoude, E. (2015). Restoring Study 329: efficacy
and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression
in adolescence. BMJ, 351, h4320. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4320.
Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks,
R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The Impact of Generative AI on
Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and
Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge Workers. Proceedings
of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778.
León XIV. (2026). Carta encíclica Magnifica humanitas sobre la custodia
de la persona humana en el tiempo de la inteligencia artificial. Ciudad
del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 15 de mayo de 2026. https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/es/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html.
Lewandowsky, S., & Cook, J. (2020). The Conspiracy Theory Handbook.
Center for Climate Change Communication. https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ConspiracyTheoryHandbook.pdf.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond
misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era.
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Mann, M. E., Brown, N. J. L., & Friedman, H.
(2016). Science and the public: Debate, denial, and skepticism.
Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2),
537-553. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.604.
Lewenstein, B., Brossard, D., & Bruce, V. (2009). A Critical
Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practice
to Inform Theory. 13-27.
Liang, W., Izzo, Z., Zhang, Y., Lepp, H., Cao, H., Zhao, X., Chen, L.,
Ye, H., Liu, S., Huang, Z., McFarland, D. A., & Zou, J. Y. (2024).
Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of
ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews. En Proceedings of the 41st
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07183.
Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023).
GPT detectors are biased against non-native
English writers. Patterns, 4(7), 100779.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779.
Linde, P. (2024). La batalla por la cirugía estética: ¿qué médicos
pueden operar? El País. https://elpais.com/sociedad/2024-09-30/la-batalla-por-la-cirugia-estetica-que-medicos-pueden-operar.html.
Lindeman, M., & Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M. (2016). Does Poor
Understanding of Physical World Predict Religious and Paranormal
Beliefs? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 736-742.
Liu, J., Li, Q., & Du, W. (2024). Beyond Benchmarking: A New
Paradigm for Evaluation and Assessment of Large Language Models.
arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.07531.
Liu, N., Hu, X. E., Savas, Y., Baum, M. A., Berinsky, A. J., Guess, A.
M., Knox, D., & Stewart, B. M. (2025). Short-Term Exposure to
Filter-Bubble Recommendation Systems Has Limited Polarization Effects:
Naturalistic Experiments on YouTube. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 122(8), e2318127122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318127122.
Lloyd, E. A. (2010). Confirmation and robustness of climate models.
Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 971-984. https://doi.org/10.1086/657427.
Lloyd, E. A., & Winsberg, E. (eds.). (2018). Climate Modelling:
Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65058-6.
Lom, P. (2001). The limits of doubt: The moral and political
implications of skepticism. Albany.
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and
Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Longino, H. E. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton
University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2tvzv0.
Longino, H. E. (2006). Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of
Behavior. En S. H. Kellert, H. E. Longino, & C. K. Waters (eds.)
Scientific Pluralism, (pp. 102-131). University of Minnesota
Press.
Lundh, A., Lexchin, J., Mintzes, B., Schroll, J. B., & Bero, L.
(2017). Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews, (2), MR000033. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3.
Lupton, D. (2019). Data Selves: More-than-Human Perspectives.
Oxford.
Lynch, M. P. (2009). Truth as One and Many. Oxford University
Press.
Malone, T. (2018). Superminds. The Surprising Power of People and
Computers Thinking Together.
Martin, B. R., & Tang, P. (2007). The Benefits from Publicly Funded
Research. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series 161, Univ. of
Sussex. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ben-Martin-8/publication/24132170_The_benefits_from_publicly_funded_research/links/58809b5ea6fdcc77e113a638/The-benefits-from-publicly-funded-research.pdf.
Martínez, N., Barberia, I., & Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J. (2024).
Proneness to false memory generation predicts pseudoscientific belief
endorsement. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & Vries, R. de. (2005).
Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737-738.
https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a.
Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Do
highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?
Scientometrics.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public
vs. Private Sector Myths. Londres: Anthem Press. Tesis discutida:
hay réplicas que le reprochan seleccionar los casos de éxito y no
contabilizar los fracasos de la inversión pública. Se cita como
posición, no como resultado establecido.
McCain, K., & Kampourakis, K. (eds.). (2019). What Is Scientific
Knowledge? An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science.
New York: Routledge.
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The
American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science
and Policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3),
100-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001.
McIntyre, L. C. (2015). Respecting truth: Willful ignorance in the
internet age. New York: Routledge.
Médicos Sin Fronteras. (2026). Ebola disease outbreak in DR Congo: MSF
response, key facts, and timeline. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/ebola-disease-outbreak-2026-how-msf-responding.
Medina, J. (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial
Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. New
York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001.
Meijer, A., & Wessels, M. (2019). Predictive Policing: Review of
Benefits and Drawbacks. International Journal of Public
Administration, 42(12), 1031-1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1575664.
Mendy, L., Karlsson, M., & Lindvall, D. (2024). Counteracting
Climate Denial: A Systematic Review. Public Understanding of
Science, 33(4), 504-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231223425.
Mercier, H. (2020). Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust
and What We Believe. Princeton University Press.
Merkel, A. (1998). The Role of Science in Sustainable Development.
Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5375.336.
Miller, B. (2013). When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing
shared knowledge from mere agreement. Synthese,
190(7), 1293-1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0225-5.
Milli, S., Carroll, M., Wang, Y., Pandey, S., Zhao, S., & Dragan, A.
D. (2025). Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of
Divisive Content on Social Media. PNAS Nexus, 4(3),
pgaf062. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf062.
Ministerio de Sanidad. (2026). Homeopatía y productos homeopáticos:
evaluación de las evidencias acerca de su eficacia y seguridad.
Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Gobierno de España. Revisión de 64
revisiones sistemáticas publicadas desde 2009. Nota de prensa de 21 de
abril de 2026. https://www.sanidad.gob.es/gabinete/notasPrensa.do?id=6893.
Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-Mart: Privatizing American
Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L.,
Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model
cards for model reporting. En Proceedings of the Conference on
Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, (pp. 220-229). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596.
Mitchell, S. D. (2009). Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and
Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Caps. 1 y 6.
Moats, D., & Ganguly, C. (2025). Bringing AI
Participation Down to Scale. Patterns, 6(5), 101241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101241.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P.
(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and
meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS
medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Molas-Gallart, J., Pablo D’Este, O. L., & Rafols, I. (2015). Towards
an alternative framework for the evaluation of translational research
initiatives. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv027.
Montefiore, S. S. (2026, junio 28). The Democracies Can Still Triumph:
Liberal societies need to show they can win—without destroying their own
values from within. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/06/democracy-history-autocracies-dictatorships/687720/.
Moreno Muñoz, M. (2021). Negacionismo y conflicto social. Gazeta de
antropología. http://www.gazeta-antropologia.es/?p=5537.
Moreno Muñoz, M. (2024). Gradualismo versus singularidad en la
interpretación de riesgos asociados con la inteligencia artificial
general. Revista de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la
Ciencia en España, núm. 68: 37–47. https://solofici.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Revista-de-la-Sociedad-de-Logica-Metodologia-y-Filosofia-de-la-Ciencia-en-Espana-num.-68-febrero-2024.pdf.
Moreno Muñoz, M. (2025). La tribu desinformada. Sobre el valor del
conocimiento para la cooperación social. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15484149.
Moreno Muñoz, M. (2026a). Impacto laboral de los servicios de
IA generativa y agéntica. Análisis sobre nichos de empleo
masivo (2025-2031) (Version v1. 2026). Zenodo. Version v1. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18548486.
Moreno Muñoz, M. (2026b). La inteligencia distribuida: cómo los agentes
artificiales transformarán la vida, el trabajo y el conocimiento
(Version v1. 2026). Zenodo. Version v1. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18172798.
Morin, E. (2001). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del
futuro.París: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000117740_spa.
Morrison, A. (2026). Underestimates in global warming pose major climate
and financial risks. Technical report / white paper. Parasol Lost. Green
Future Solutions, 14 January 2026. https://greenfuturessolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Parasol-Lost-Final.pdf.
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers,
C. D., Percie du Sert, N., et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible
science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
NASA. (2026). NASA analysis shows La Niña limited sea level rise in
2025. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. La subida de 2025 fue de solo 0,08 cm
por efecto de La Niña, frente a 0,58 cm en 2024; desde 1993 el nivel
medio ha subido unos 10 cm y la tasa anual se ha más que duplicado. https://www.nasa.gov/earth/nasa-analysis-shows-la-nina-limited-sea-level-rise-in-2025/
(Consultado el 24/08/2026).
Nature. (2025). The EU’s Horizon Research Fund Needs to
Stay a Defence-Free Zone. Nature. Editorial. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03221-2.
Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.
Episteme, 17(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in
Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2),
175-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2020). The wise company: How
companies create continuous innovation. Oxford University Press.
Noor, D. (2024). Big oil privately acknowledged efforts to downplay
climate crisis, joint committee investigation finds. The
Guardian. Joint committee investigation reveals internal documents
showing coordinated efforts to mislead the public. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/30/big-oil-climate-crisis-us-senate-report.
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T.
(2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental Evidence on the
Productivity Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence.
Science, 381(6654), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586.
NxCode. (2026). Guía de OpenAI Frontier: Plataforma de Agentes de IA….
NxCode; en español. https://www.nxcode.io/es/resources/news/openai-frontier-enterprise-ai-agent-platform-guide-2026.
Nyhan, B., Settle, J., Thorson, E., Wojcieszak, M., et al. (2023).
Like-Minded Sources on Facebook Are Prevalent but Not Polarizing.
Nature, 620(7972), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06297-w.
Oceanic, N. (National., & Administration), A. (2010). What Is Coral
Bleaching?
OECD. (2020). The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six
Dimensions of a Digital Government. OECD Public Governance Policy
Papers (n.º 02). OECD Publishing. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers
No. 02. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en.
Office of Inspector General, City of Chicago. (2020). Advisory
Concerning the Chicago Police Departments Predictive Risk
Models. Office of Inspector General. https://igchicago.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/OIG-Advisory-Concerning-CPDs-Predictive-Risk-Models-.pdf.
OpenAI. (2025). Introducing ChatGPT Agent. OpenAI. https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-agent/.
OpenAI. (2026). Frontier: una plataforma empresarial para construir y
gestionar agentes de IA. OpenAI. https://openai.com/es-ES/business/frontier/.
Oppenheimer, M., Oreskes, N., Jamieson, D., Brysse, K., O’Reilly, J.,
Shindell, M., & Wazeck, M. (2019). Discerning experts: The
Practices of Scientific Assessment for Environmental Policy.
University of Chicago Press.
Oreskes, N. (2004a). Consensus in science: How do we know we’re not
wrong. presented at the AAAS meeting on. https://www.lpl.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/resources/globalwarming/oreskes-chapter-4.pdf.
Oreskes, N. (2004b). The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.
Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618.
Oreskes, Naomi. (2019). Why Trust Science? Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189932.
Oreskes, Naomi, & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How
a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke
to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Errata and
corrections available at: https://www.merchantsofdoubt.org/home/errata/.
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994).
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the
Earth Sciences. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.641.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2026). Ebola outbreak — Democratic
Republic of the Congo, 2026. Página de situación de emergencia. https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/ebola-outbreak---drc-2026.
Page, E. (2006). Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations.
Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/climate-change-justice-and-future-generations-9781843761846.html.
Page, & al, M. J. et. (2021a). Assessing risk of bias due to missing
results in a synthesis. In J. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-13.
Page, & al, M. J. et. (2021b). The PRISMA 2020
statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PLOS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583.
Pantea, M.-C. (2026). Degrees of Doubt: Overqualification as a Blind
Spot at the Base of the Knowledge Economy. Minerva,
64(1), 217-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09564-w.
Parker, W. (2026). Climate Science. En E. N. Zalta & U.
Nodelman (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2026/entries/climate-science/;
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Parker, W. S. (2011). When climate models agree: the significance of
robust model predictions. Philosophy of Science,
78(4), 579-600. https://doi.org/10.1086/661566.
Parra, S. (2022). El 99,9 % de los estudios científicos lo confirma: el
cambio climático está causado por el ser humano. National geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/ciencia/999-estudios-cientificos-confirma-cambio-climatico-esta-causado-por-ser-humano_18994.
Penfield, T., Baker, M. J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M. J. (2014).
Assessment, Evaluations, and Definitions of Research Impact: A Review.
Research Evaluation, 23(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021.
Pereda, O., & Raffio, V. (2018, octubre 19). Los imperios económicos
de los charlatanes de la pseudociencia. El Periódico. Cifras
destacadas: Pàmies Horticoles S.L. (constituida 1999; 20 empleados) —
ingresos > €2,000,000 (último año), beneficio €136,591 (caída 13%
respecto a 2016); beneficios históricos: €40,335 (2013), €141,855
(2014). Instituto Enric Corbera (constituido 2014; 13 empleados) —
ingresos > €4,300,000 (2016), beneficio €964,763. https://www.elperiodico.com/es/sociedad/20181019/facturacion-empresas-pseudociencia-pamies-corbera-marti-7097119.
Peters, H. P. (2013). Gap between science and media revisited:
Scientists as public communicators. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.
Pielke, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in
Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818110.
Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M. (eds.). (2013). Philosophy of
Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.001.0001.
Pohlhaus, G. (2012). Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward
a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance. Hypatia,
27(4), 715-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge;
Kegan Paul.
Popkin, R. H. (1979a). Historia del escepticismo. De Erasmo a
Spinoza.
Popkin, R. H. (1979b). The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to
Spinoza. Univ of California Press.
Popkin, R. H., & Popkin, R. H. (2003). The history of
scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle (Rev. and expanded ed).
Popkin, & H, R. (1999). Skepticism | Definition, Philosophy,
examples, History, & Criticism. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/skepticism.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of
Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (1980). La lógica de la investigación científica.
Madrid: Tecnos. Traducción de «Logik der Forschung» (1934). El pasaje
citado es el cap. 1, aptdo. 3, «Contrastación deductiva de teorías».
Por qué la primera encíclica del papa León XIV sobre inteligencia
artificial encendió las alarmas en Silicon Valley. (2026).
Infobae. 31 de mayo de 2026. https://www.infobae.com/estados-unidos/2026/05/31/por-que-la-primera-enciclica-del-papa-leon-xiv-sobre-inteligencia-artificial-encendio-las-alarmas-en-silicon-valley/.
Portier, C. J., Armstrong, B. K., Baguley, B. C., et al. (2016).
Differences in the Carcinogenic Evaluation of Glyphosate between the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food
Safety Authority (EFSA). Journal of Epidemiology and Community
Health, 70(8), 741-745. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-207005.
Presidencia de los Estados Unidos. (2025). Executive Order 14162:
Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements. Orden
ejecutiva firmada el 20 de enero de 2025. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202500129/html/DCPD-202500129.htm.
Proctor, R. N. (2012). The history of the discovery of the
cigarette-lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial,
global toll. Tobacco Control, 21(2), 87-91. Crossref
devuelve el título con el sufijo «: Table 1», artefacto del depósito del
editor; retirado. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050338.
Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (eds.). (2008). Agnotology:
The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press.
Quadrado, S. (2024). Sara Gómez y la liposucción letal que ha traído
justicia. La Vanguardia. https://www.lavanguardia.com/vida/20240922/9958358/sara-gomez-liposuccion-letal-traido-justicia.html.
Rehg, W. (2009). Cogent science in context: The science wars,
argumentation theory, and Habermas. Mit Press.
Rescher, N. (1973). Coherence Theory of Truth. Londres.
Ribeiro, M. H., Ottoni, R., West, R., Almeida, V. A. F., & Meira, W.
(2020). Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube. En
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and
Transparency, (pp. 131-141). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372879.
Rich, A. S., & Gureckis, T. M. (2019). Lessons for artificial
intelligence from the study of natural stupidity. Nature Machine
Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0038-z.
Robards, B., & Lincoln, S. (2017). Uncovering Longitudinal Life
Narratives: Scrolling Back on Facebook. Qualitative Research,
17(6), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117700707.
Roldán-Monés, T. (2024). When GenAI Increases Inequality: Evidence from
a University Debating Competition. EsadeEcPol. https://www.esade.edu/ecpol/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2409-ChatGPTRoldan_ecpol.pdf.
Roncancio-Marin, J., & Guerrero, M. (2024). University Technology
Transfer Offices’ Capabilities in Responding to Societal Challenges:
Lessons from an Exploratory Study during the COVID-19
Pandemic. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(6),
2135-2158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10120-7.
Rüffin, N. V., Cramer, K. C., Mayer, M., & Nock, P. J. (2026).
“Research Security” in Germany and the United
States: Shifting Governance of Scientific Collaboration under
Geopolitical Pressure. Global Policy, 17(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70103.
Rushforth, A., Gogadze, N., Skhirtladze, T., & Pölönen, J. (2026).
Advancing Open Science through Research Assessment Reform? Content
Analysis of CoARA Action Plans. Scientometrics,
131(6), 3897-3918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05650-w.
Russell, B. (1912). Problems of Philosophy. London: Oxford
University Press.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern
Approach. Pearson Higher Education.
Salas, J. (2016, julio 29). Una revisión invalida miles de estudios del
cerebro: Un fallo informático y malas prácticas generalizadas ponen en
entredicho 15 años de investigaciones. El País. Accedido:
2026-08-27. https://elpais.com/elpais/2016/07/26/ciencia/1469532340_615895.html.
Sarewitz, D. (2004). How Science Makes Environmental Controversies
Worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5),
385-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001.
Saunders, J., Hunt, P., & Hollywood, J. S. (2016). Predictions Put
into Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Chicagos
Predictive Policing Pilot. Journal of Experimental Criminology,
12(3), 347-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9272-0.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals
Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography. (2026). Annual carbon dioxide peak
reaches 432 parts per million. UC San Diego. Pico de mayo de 2026:
432,00 ppm segun Scripps y 432,3 ppm segun NOAA, 1,8 ppm por encima del
pico de 2025. https://scripps.ucsd.edu/news/annual-carbon-dioxide-peak-reaches-432-parts-million
(Consultado el 24/08/2026).
Senior, M. (2017). After Glybera’s withdrawal, what’s next for gene
therapy? Nature Biotechnology, 35(6), 491-492. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0617-491.
Shmerling, R. H. (2020). The Placebo Effect: Amazing and Real.
Harvard Health. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-placebo-effect-amazing-and-real-201511028544.
Shrivastava, P., Kasuga, F., & Grant, J. (2023). From Climate
Science to Climate Action. Global Sustainability, 6,
e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.19.
Silvast, A., & Williams, R. (2026). The Politics of Artifacts
Revisited: Information Infrastructures, Power, and Governance.
Sociology Compass, 20(7), e70234. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70234.
Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing
challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition,
motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. New York.
SIPRI. (2026). Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2025.
Estocolmo: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2026/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2025.
Slaughter, I., Peytavin, A., Ugander, J., & Saveski, M. (2025).
Community Notes Reduce Engagement with and Diffusion of False
Information Online. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 122(38), e2503413122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2503413122.
Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of
bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384.
Tiene una corrección publicada en 2023: doi 10.1098/rsos.231026. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384.
Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science
and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
99(4), 178-182. El autor fue director del BMJ durante trece
años; el texto es a la vez testimonio y revisión de la evidencia
experimental sobre revisión por pares. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900414.
Sterne, & al, J. A. C. et. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for
assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2024). Epistemology. En E. N. Zalta & U.
Nodelman (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Making Globalization Work. New York: W.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and
Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Press.
Subaveerapandiyan, A. (2025). Preservation, Digital Technology &
Culture, 54(4), 357-377. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/pdtc-2025-0047.
Sulston, J., & Ferry, G. (2002). The Common Thread: A Story of
Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome. Londres: Bantam
Press. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/547103.
Supran, G., Rahmstorf, S., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Assessing
ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science,
379(6628), eabk0063. Las proyecciones internas de la compañía
entre 1977 y 2003 fueron acertadas y tan competentes como las
académicas, mientras su comunicación pública las contradecía. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063.
Suskind, R. (2004). Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W.
Bush. The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/faith-certainty-and-the-presidency-of-george-w-bush.html.
Susser, D., Roessler, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Technology,
Autonomy, and Manipulation. Internet Policy Review,
8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1410.
Swan, M. (2012). Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable
Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0. Journal
of Sensor and Actuator Networks. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan1030217.
Sweet, W. V. et al. (2022). Global and Regional Sea Level Rise
Scenarios for the United States: Updated Mean Projections and Extreme
Water Level Probabilities Along U.S. Coastlines. Silver Spring, MD:
National Oceanic; Atmospheric Administration. Esfuerzo interagencias.
Proyecta para la costa estadounidense un ascenso de 25 a 30 cm entre
2020 y 2050, tanto como el acumulado en los cien años anteriores. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/hazards/sealevelrise/.
Sytnik, V. M., & Proskuryakova, L. N. (2024). Expanding Foresight
Methodology to Better Understand the Unknown Future and Identify
Hard-to-Predict Events. European Journal of Futures Research,
12, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-024-00244-2.
Tayag, Y. (2024, noviembre 9). «Make America Healthy Again»
Sounds Good Until You Start Asking Questions: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s
health agenda is politically slippery. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2024/11/robert-kennedy-jr-trump-maha/680612/.
Tessler, M. H., Bakker, M. A., Jarrett, D., Sheahan, H., Chadwick, M.
J., Koster, R., & Summerfield, C. (2024). AI Can Help
Humans Find Common Ground in Democratic Deliberation. Science,
386(6719), eadq2852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq2852.
Tezuka, T., Ito, N., & Takahashi, K. (2026). The impact of U.S.
foreign aid reduction on global health. Tropical Medicine and
Health, 54, 33. Las cifras sanitarias que recoge son
PROYECCIONES modelizadas para 2025-2030, no recuentos observados. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00894-3.
Tight, M. (2020). Higher education: discipline or field of study?
Tertiary Education and Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-020-09060-2.
Toma, C., & Padureanu, L. (2021). An exploratory analysis of 4844
withdrawn articles and their retraction notes. bioRxiv (Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory). https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.30.462625.
Torres-Salinas, D., & Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2009). Estrategia
para mejorar la difusión de los resultados de investigación con la Web
2.0. El Profesional de la Información, 18(5), 534-539.
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.sep.07.
Unión Europea. (2024). Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 por el que se
establecen normas armonizadas en materia de inteligencia artificial.
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. Las obligaciones para modelos de IA
de uso general, entre ellas el resumen público del contenido de
entrenamiento, se aplican desde el 2 de agosto de 2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401689
(Consultado el 23/08/2026).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (s. f.). Maximum acceptable level of
ozone (21 CFR 801.415). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Chapter
I, Subchapter H, Part 801. Apartado (a): «Ozone is a toxic gas with no
known useful medical application in specific, adjunctive, or preventive
therapy». https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-801/subpart-H/section-801.415
(Consultado el 23/08/2026).
Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide
to a Future Worth Wanting. Londres.
Van den Oord, S., Kenis, P., Raab, J., & Cambré, B. (2023). Modes of
Network Governance Revisited: Assessing Their Prevalence, Promises, and
Limitations in the Literature. Public Administration Review,
83(6), 1564-1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13736.
Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted
in 2023 — a new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479-481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8.
Vanegas, S. (2026, septiembre 4). «Nunca se había privado a tantos
niños del acceso a tantas historias»: el crecimiento imparable de
la prohibición de libros en escuelas públicas de EE.UU. BBC News Mundo.
https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cm2g66y4npro.
Véliz, C. (2020). Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back
Control of Your Data. Londres: Bantam Press.
Véliz, C. (2024). The Ethics of Privacy and Surveillance.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Venturini, S., Urbinati, A., Gallo, P., Davis, J. T., & Vespignani,
A. (2026). The retraction epidemic in science across publishers, fields,
and countries. arXiv:2604.02302. **Preprint**: no ha pasado revisión por
pares. Se cita como tal y así se declara en el texto. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02302.
Vicente, M. R., Álvarez-Rodríguez, C., & Suárez-Álvarez, A. (2025).
An Old Familiar Song? Assessing the Artificial Intelligence Divide among
the Regions of the European Union and Its Connections with Digital
Divides. Telecommunications Policy, 49(8), 103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103030.
Vickers, A. J., Vertosick, E. A., Lewith, G., MacPherson, H., Foster, N.
E., Sherman, K. J., Irnich, D., Witt, C. M., & Linde, K. (2018).
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data
Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Pain, 19(5), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.005.
Victor, D. G. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More
Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge
University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/global-warming-gridlock/C3CA34B8CF61FAAB6929ABF98FDF965E.
Vidal Valero, M. (2023). Thousands of scientists are cutting back on
Twitter, seeding angst and uncertainty. Nature,
620(7974), 482-484. Pieza periodística de Nature sobre una
encuesta propia a investigadores; no es un artículo de investigación. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02554-0.
Villalobos, C., Parcerisa, L., Castillo, K., & Olguin, T. (2024).
EdTech Companies and Contemporary Digital Educational Governance.
International Journal of Educational Development, 110,
103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103141.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and
False News Online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.
Walker, R. C. S. (2018). The Coherence Theory of Truth. In M.
Walker-Crawford, N. (2026). Save the Climate but Don’t Blame Us:
Corporate Arguments in Climate Litigation. Transnational
Environmental Law, 15(1), 142-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102525100186.
Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in
the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific
Reports, 13, 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5.
Warner, J. (2011). Fact-Free Science. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/magazine/27FOB-WWLN-t.html.
Watanabe, N., Yano, K., Tsuyuki, K., Okano, T., & Yamato, M. (2015).
Re-Examination of Regulatory Opinions in Europe: Possible Contribution
for the Approval of the First Gene Therapy Product Glybera.
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development,
2, 14066. https://doi.org/10.1038/mtm.2014.66.
Webb, A., Grömping, M., & Mauk, M. (2026). Does Citizen Deliberation
inside Representative Institutions Enhance Legitimacy among
Non-participating Publics? European Journal of Political
Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1475676526101509.
Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T.,
Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023).
Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text.
International Journal for Educational Integrity,
19(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.
Weingart, P., & Joubert, M. (2019). The conflation of motives of
science communication - causes, consequences, remedies. Journal of
Science Communication. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18030401.
Welp, Y. (2024). Trends in Mini-Publics Research: High Expectations,
Mixed Findings, and Clear-Cut Challenges. International Political
Science Abstracts, 74(3), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345241262093.
Wikimedia Foundation. (2025, octubre 17). New User Trends on Wikipedia.
Diff. https://diff.wikimedia.org/2025/10/17/new-user-trends-on-wikipedia/.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G.,
Axton, M., et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific
data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3,
160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
Williams, C. R., Thodoroff, P., Arthern, R. J., et al. (2025).
Calculations of extreme sea level rise scenarios are strongly dependent
on ice sheet model resolution. Communications Earth &
Environment, 6, 60. Advertencia: las resoluciones gruesas
proyectan un rango más amplio de contribución al nivel del mar que las
finas, de modo que exageran los peores escenarios. Los autores
desaconsejan usar simulaciones con resolución de 5 km o más para
proyecciones de alto impacto. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02010-z.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019925656X.001.0001.
Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: la unidad del conocimiento.
Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg / Círculo de Lectores.
Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus,
109(1), 121-136.
Winsberg, E. (2021). What does robustness teach us in climate science: a
re-appraisal. Synthese, 198(S21), 5099-5122. Publicado
en línea el 29-11-2018 y en número en octubre de 2021; de ahí el
desajuste entre el DOI, que lleva 2018, y el año de cita. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01997-7.
Wrapp, D., Wang, N., Corbett, K. S., Goldsmith, J. A., Hsieh, C.-L.,
Abiona, O., Graham, B. S., & McLellan, J. S. (2020).
Cryo-EM Structure of the 2019-nCoV Spike in
the Prefusion Conformation. Science, 367(6483),
1260-1263. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2507.
Xiong, T., Chen, H., Luo, R., & Mu, D. (2016). Hyperbaric oxygen
therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010922.pub2.
Ye, J., Luceri, L., & Ferrara, E. (2025). Auditing Political
Exposure Bias: Algorithmic Amplification on Twitter/X
During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. En
Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability,
and Transparency (FAccT ’25). https://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732159.
Zadrozny, B., & Collins, B. (2020, octubre 15). YouTube bans QAnon,
other conspiracy content that targets individuals. NBC News. Publicado
15 Oct 2020; "YouTube said it would be enforcing the updated policy
immediately and plans to ’ramp up in the weeks to come.’". https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/youtube-bans-qanon-other-conspiracy-content-targets-individuals-n1243525.
Zagzebski, L. T. (2012). Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust,
Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford University Press.
Zhang, L., Beibei Sun, F. S., & Huang, Y. (2022). Comparing paper
level classifications across different methods and systems: an
investigation of Nature publications. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04352-3.
Zhou, R., & Tang, P. (2020). The role of university Knowledge
Transfer Offices: Not just commercialize research outputs!
Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102100.
Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science: What it is, and what it means.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for
a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Nueva York:
PublicAffairs.
Bibliografía complementaria
Este bloque incluye fuentes utilizadas en diversas fases de la preparación del material pero no respaldan una afirmación o apartado específico del texto. Forman parte del histórico de búsquedas y de las incorporaciones sucesivas en talleres y prácticas. Se conservan porque documentan el recorrido de la investigación y pueden servir como punto de partida para los dosieres de los grupos de trabajo involucrados en talleres prácticos.
NotaMostrar el listado de fuentes complementarias (101 entradas, ordenadas por autoría)
- Albareda, J. L (2025). The Ethical Paradox of Automation: AI Moral Status as a Challenge to the End of Human Work. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10250-z
- Alodat, Abdelsalam M, Lamis F. Al-Qora’n y Hamoud, Muwafaq Abu (2023). Social Media Platforms and Political Participation: A Study of Jordanian Youth Engagement. Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070402
- An, Y, Williams, M y Xiao, M (2024). The Cost of Knowledge: Academic Journal Pricing and Research Dissemination. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4691124
- Arditi, David (2019). Digital Demagogue: Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Trump and Twitter. New Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2019.1680190
- Arndt, T (2025). Media bias: Examining the facts. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Asma, Stephen T (2019). The emotional mind: The affective roots of culture and cognition. Cambridge.
- Benkler, Yochai, Robert Faris y Roberts, Hal (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Nueva York.
- Benson, Ophelia y Stangroom, Jeremy (2007). Why truth matters. Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Bernecker, S y Pritchard, D (2011). The routledge companion to epistemology. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781136882012
- Brown, W (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. MIT Press.
- Bucchi, Massimiano (2008). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. Londres.
- Cartwright, Nancy (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167093
- Cartwright, Nancy (1999). Fables and models. En The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167093.003
- Chaudhary, A (2025). AI Agentic Workflows: the next frontier in enterprise automation. https://www.turing.com/resources/ai-agentic-workflows
- Chirat, A y Hédoin, C (2024). Democracy, Epistocracy and Hybrid decision-making: Information specificity and costs of political governance. https://hal.science/hal-04691620v1
- Coady, David (2012). What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Chichester.
- Cutter, Asher D (2023). Evolving Tomorrow: Genetic Engineering and the Evolutionary Future of the Anthropocene. Londres.
- Davies, Martin (2021). The Enlightenment and the Fate of Knowledge: Essays on the Transvaluation of Values. Londres.
- Delmestri, G, Oberg, A y Drori, G. S (2015). The Unbearable Lightness of University Branding. International Studies of Management & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1006012
- Desmond, Hugh y Ramsey, Grant (2023). Human Success: Evolutionary Origins and Ethical Implications. Londres.
- Dryzek, J. S, Norgaard, R. B y Schlosberg, D (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press.
- Dumas, L. J (2019). Building the good society: The Power and Limits of Markets, Democracy and Freedom in an Increasingly Polarized World. Emerald Group Publishing.
- D’Agostino, Fred (2009). Naturalizing Epistemology: Thomas Kuhn and the `essential Tension’. Basingstoke.
- Ehlers, U y Eigbrecht, L (2024). Creating the university of the future: A Global View on Future Skills and Future Higher Education. Springer VS.
- Eriksen, E. O (2021). The accountability of expertise: Making the Un-Elected Safe for Democracy. Routledge.
- Evans, C, Rees, G, Taylor, C y Fox, S (2020). A liberal higher education for all? The massification of higher education and its implications for graduates participation in civil society. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00554-x
- Fabbri, A, Lai, A, Grundy, Q y Bero, L. A (2018). The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304677
- Fan, Jianqing, Yingying Fan, Jinchi Lv y Yang, Fan (2022). SIMPLE-RC: Group network inference with non-sharp nulls and weak signals. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2211.00128
- FitzPatrick, William J (2022). Ethical Realism. Cambridge.
- Garlick, A, Junk, W. M y Brown, H (2025). How Lobbying Matters. Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033123-124920
- Gazmararian, Alexander F y Tingley, Dustin (2023). Uncertain Futures: How to Unlock the Climate Impasse. Cambridge.
- Ginsberg, B (2011). The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters. OUP USA.
- Giri, Leandro, Pablo Melogno y Miguel, Hernán (2023). Perspectives on Kuhn: Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn. Cham.
- Góra, M, Holst, C y Warat, M (2019). Expertisation and democracy in Europe. Routledge.
- Gutiérrez-Caneda, B, Lindén, C y Vázquez-Herrero, J (2024). Ethics and journalistic challenges in the age of artificial intelligence: talking with professionals and experts. Frontiers in Communication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1465178
- Haas, P (2021). Epistemic Communities. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198849155.003.0040
- Hackett, Edward J, Amsterdamska, Olga, Lynch, Michael, Wajcman, Judy y eds (2008). The handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press.
- Hendrycks, D, Burns, C, Basart, S, Zou, A, Mazeika, M, Song, D y Steinhardt, J (2020). Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2009.03300
- Holyoak, Keith James, Robert G. Morrison y eds (2012). The oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Nueva York.
- Jones, Candace, Mark Lorenzen, Jonathan Sapsed y eds (2015). The oxford handbook of creative industries. Oxford University Press.
- Jose, B, Cherian, J, Verghis, A. M, Varghise, S. M, S, M y Joseph, S (2025). The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1550621
- Kellert, Stephen H, Helen E. Longino y eds (2006). Scientific Pluralism.
- Khanal, S, Zhang, H y Taeihagh, A (2024). Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process?. Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae012
- Kling, A (2009). Unchecked and unbalanced: How the Discrepancy Between Knowledge and Power Caused the Financial Crisis and Threatens Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Darren G. Lilleker y Vedel, Thierry (2016). Civic political engagement and social change in the new digital age. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616218
- Krickel, B (2024). The New Mechanistic Approach and Cognitive Ontology. Minds and Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09679-9
- Kuhn, Thomas S (1979). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (edic. orig.
- Kurban, C. F y Şahin, M (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education: Exploring the AI Revolution. Emerald Group Publishing.
- Lackey, Jennifer (2020). The Epistemology of Groups. Cary. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199656608.001.0001
- Ladyman, James (2012). Understanding Philosophy of Science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203463680
- Latour, Bruno (1992). Ciencia en acción: cómo seguir a los científicos e ingenieros a través de la sociedad. Barcelona: Labor.
- Leaf, C (2013). The Truth in Small Doses: Why We’re Losing the War on Cancer-and How to Win It. Simon and Schuster.
- Leander, A y Waever, O (2019). Assembling exclusive expertise: Knowledge, Ignorance and Conflict Resolution in the Global South.
- Lessig, Lawrence (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. Londres.
- Levitin, Daniel J (2017). Weaponized Lies: How to Think Critically in the Post-Truth Era. Nueva York.
- Levy, D. M y Peart, S. J (2017). Escape from Democracy: The Role of Experts and the Public in Economic Policy. Cambridge University Press.
- Levy, Neil (2022). Bad beliefs: Why they happen to good people. Londres.
- LeWine, Howard E (2021). The Power of the Placebo Effect. Harvard Health. https://www.health.harvard.edu/mental-health/the-power-of-the-placebo-effect
- Lucky, M. C (2023). Knowledge-Making in Politics: Expertise in Democracy and Epistocracy. Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231199495
- Lynch, Michael P (2001). Truth in context: An essay on pluralism and objectivity. Cambridge.
- Lynch, Michael P y Wyatt, Jeremy (2021). The Nature of Truth, second edition The Nature of Truth, second edition: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Londres.
- Malaspina, Cecile (2018). An Epistemology of Noise. Londres.
- Marcus, G (2020). The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence. ARXIV. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.06177
- Marulli, F, Campanile, L, De Biase, M. S, Marrone, S, Verde, L y Bifulco, M (2024). Understanding Readability of Large Language Models Output: An Empirical Analysis. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.636
- McIntyre, L (2023). On disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy. MIT Press.
- McIntyre, Lee C y McIntyre, Lee (2021). The scientific attitude: Defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience. HighBridge Audio.
- Meadows, Donella H, Jorgen Randers y Meadows, Dennis L. (2004). The Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Londres.
- Nichols, T. M (2017). The death of expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and why it Matters. Oxford University Press.
- Ober, J (2008). Democracy and knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens.
- Oreskes, Naomi y Conway, Erik M. (2020). Mercaderes de la duda: Cómo un puñado de científicos ocultaron la verdad sobre el calentamiento global. CAPITÁN SWING LIBROS.
- O’Sullivan, H, Polkinghorne, M, Chapleo, C y Cownie, F (2024). Contemporary Branding Strategies for Higher Education. Encyclopedia. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4030085
- Peels, Rik (2023). Ignorance: A Philosophical Study. Nueva York.
- Polok, B, El-Taj, H y Rana, A. A (2023). Balancing Potential and Peril: The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4484386
- Popper, Karl (1993). Logica de La Investigacion. Tecnos.
- Rapeli, L (2014). The Conception of Citizen Knowledge in Democratic Theory. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322869
- Rich, Alexander S y Gureckis, Todd M. (2019). Lessons for artificial intelligence from the study of natural stupidity. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0038-z
- Rosenfeld, Richard y Fornango, Robert (2017). The Relationship Between Crime and Stop, Question, and Frisk Rates in New York City Neighborhoods. Justice Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1275748
- Samaržija, Hana, Quassim Cassam y eds (2023). The Epistemology of Democracy. Londres.
- Scharre, Paul (2023). Four Battlegrounds: Power in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Nueva York.
- Seeber, M (2024). Changes in scientific publishing and possible impact on authors choice of journals. ChemTexts. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-024-00190-3
- Selwyn, N (2014). Internet y educación. C@mbio - OpenMind. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/articulos/internet-y-educacion
- Shen, C y Björk, B (2015). Predatory open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
- Shool, S, Adimi, S, Amleshi, R. S, Bitaraf, E, Golpira, R y Tara, M (2025). A systematic review of large language model (LLM) evaluations in clinical medicine. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02954-4
- Sosa, Ernest (2007). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001
- Stea, Jonathan N y Hupp, Stephen (2023). Investigating Clinical Psychology: Pseudoscience, Fringe Science, and Controversies. Routledge.
- Sunstein, Cass R (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Nueva York.
- Taylor, B. J, Cantwell, B y Slaughter, S (2013). Quasi-Markets in U.S. Higher Education: The Humanities and Institutional Revenues. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2013.0030
- Theocharis, Yannis, Shelley Boulianne, Karolina Koc-Michalska y Bimber, Bruce (2022). Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410
- Triggle, C. R, MacDonald, R, Triggle, D. J y Grierson, D (2021). Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges. Accountability in Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1909481
- United Nations. s/f. “Cambio climático | Naciones Unidas”. Consultado el 19 de septiembre de 2023. (2023). https://www.un.org/es/global-issues/climate-change
- Väliverronen, E, Sihvonen, T, Laaksonen, S y Koskela, M (2022). Branding the wow-academy: The risks of promotional culture and quasi-corporate communication in higher education. Studies in Communication Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.03.3285
- Weisberg, Herbert I (2014). Willful Ignorance: The Mismeasure of Uncertainty. Hoboken.
- Williams, Daniel (2021). Signalling, commitment, and strategic absurdities. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12392
- Williston, Byron (2023). The Ethics of Climate Change: An Introduction.
- Wæraas, A y Solbakk, M. N (2008). Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9155-z
- Xiao y Y. a. M. a. W. a. M (2024). High Prices and Market Power of Academic Publishing Reduce Article Citations. ProMarket. https://www.promarket.org/2024/04/24/high-prices-and-market-power-of-academic-publishing-reduce-article-citations/
- Yang, Riyan, Lin Li, Wensheng Gan, Zefeng Chen y Qi, Zhenlian (2023). The Human-Centric Metaverse: A Survey. En Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference.
- Zarif, A (2023). The Economics of Scientific Publishing. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.59249/omsp9618
- ——— (1987). Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity, 1894-1912. Chicago.
- ——— (2004). True to Life: Why Truth Matters. Routledge.
- ——— (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50Th anniversary edition (edic. orig.